Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Not in Kansas
Brownback wants no Guantanamo detainees in Leavenworth
by Ken Newton
Friday, December 5, 2008
Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., leads members of the press on a tour of Fort Leavenworth Thursday afternoon to point out the problems he sees with housing enemy combatants in the Fort Leavenworth Disciplinary Barracks. Photographs of the barracks are prohibited, prompting the tour to stop at the decommissioned prison.

Photo by Eric Keith / St. Joseph News-Press / Purchase this photo

Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., leads members of the press on a tour of Fort Leavenworth Thursday afternoon to point out the problems he sees with housing enemy combatants in the Fort Leavenworth Disciplinary Barracks. Photographs of the barracks are prohibited, prompting the tour to stop at the decommissioned prison.

LEAVENWORTH, Kan. — Students walked out the front doors of Dwight D. Eisenhower Elementary School and pondered the U.S. senator with television cameras pointed his way. With the children curious, Sen. Sam Brownback voiced concern.

The lawmaker stopped at the base school to illustrate his belief that Fort Leavenworth, 38 miles south of St. Joseph, would prove a bad fit for transferred detainees from the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba.

President-elect Barack Obama said he will close the detention facility at Guantanamo. Mr. Brownback said the Leavenworth fort lacks the design, the size, the mission, the location and the legal status to become the next stop for about 250 detainees.

In addition, he said if the U.S. government decides to put enemy combatants at the fort, it creates a risk for Leavenworth and base residents. His stop at the Eisenhower School was meant to reinforce the point.

“It would be a doable task for terrorists to quickly bust through that front gate and get in one of these schools,” he said.

During a base tour, the senator also stopped at the Command and General Staff College, whose alumni include Gens. Colin Powell and David Petraeus. With its $115 million Lewis and Clark Center opened just last year, the college was referred to repeatedly as the “intellectual center” of the U.S. Army.

“This is primarily an educational base. It is not primarily a military security base,” Mr. Brownback said. “Now the idea you can make it a major terrorist site ... I really think is wrong-headed, is foolhardy and will really be harmful to the primary mission.”

During the campaign, Mr. Obama called for the closure of the Guantanamo detention site. He voiced no opinion on legislation proposed last year by Sen. Tom Harkin, an Iowa Democrat, about using the 500-bed Fort Leavenworth Disciplinary Barracks as a new residence for the detainees.

During a pre-tour press conference at Leavenworth’s community center, Mr. Brownback urged members of the Obama transition team to visit the Kansas base and see its unsuitability for detainees. He noted the near proximity of the Missouri River, a rail line and a metropolitan area as reasons to reject such an idea.

Further, the senator cited Defense Department directives that prohibit the confinement of military prisoners with enemy prisoners. He also said he would introduce a bill that rules out Fort Leavenworth as an alternative for Guantanamo detainees.

The mayors of Leavenworth and Lansing spoke at the press conference, as did Congresswoman-elect Lynn Jenkins. All, plus the chamber of commerce that serves the neighboring towns, oppose the detainee transfer.

“It would require a substantial increase in local, county, state and federal law enforcement officials to keep this area safe,” said Lisa Weakley, Leavenworth mayor.

Ms. Jenkins, who won the 2nd District House seat last month, said she did not want the local military base to become the “Guantanamo of the Midwest.”

Ken Newton can be reached

at kenn@npgco.com.

Comments
This story has 2 comments. Click here to join in on the discussion.
Story Tools
Hyperlink Legend
E-mail story
Print friendly version
iPod friendly version

Today's Top Headlines
A darn good dog
New county inspector takes on variety of tasks
Soldier shares stories from war
Palin to resign from office
What are the benefits of art?
  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
wildwest December 5, 2008 at 2:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This is going to be a real challenge as time moves forward. The thought processes about closing Guantanamo need to be re-evaluated before final decisions are made and our elected officials really need to get away from the politics driving the closure idea and start thinking about the security of this nation and the other elements Guantanamo plays in that arena as far as a strategic location goes. We continually hear about the past events associated with the prisoners, and I agree that a few people blew it. However, they were held accountable and Guantanamo holds some very serious people under lock and key who want to take out the entire western world. If given the chance, they will do whatever it takes and will organize to aoccomplish their goal. Those people should not ever be under estimated in their capabalities or attempts made to "philisophically" figure them out. They want us gone and will stop at nothing to achieve what they seek. Nothing is ever talked about of how those people are in the prison, and the behavior they portray. Our security people in the military are continually treated with disdain by many who are locked up there, and they are locked up for a reason. Leavenworth is not the answer.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
WhoisJohnGalt December 5, 2008 at 12:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

With all due respect to Mr Brownback, Fort Leavenworth is a MILITARY base. If the soldiers are unequipped or untrained in matters military, it is time to upgrade the post or close it. He could probably make a better case for lack of bed space at the Disciplinary Barracks. To make the case that the primary Armed Forces prison is not equipped to take prisoners sounds foolish to me. Sorry, that dog don't hunt.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: