November 21, 2009
What's Inside:
Council narrowly approves pact with Museums Inc.
The St. Joseph City Council put an end to a much-debated museum issue. But the ending could signify the beginning of a new battle.
The council voted 5-4 Monday evening to approve a one-year contract between the city and St. Joseph Museums Inc.
Critics of the contract, including Ellis Cross and the Friends of the Museum Hill Mansion, call the contract “unconstitutional” and have said they’d sue the city if it approved the contract. Following the vote, Mr. Cross wouldn’t comment on his next move.
The city’s museum property tax used to only fund the Wyeth-Tootle mansion. The new contract gives Museums Inc. $300,000 a year for operations at any of its sites, including the private complex on Frederick Avenue. The Museums’ Wyeth-Tootle will receive $100,000 a year.
The tax could generate additional funding, and City Manager Vince Capell has proposed putting some of it toward the city’s new nature center.
Opponents of the contract took issue with wording in the contract, worrying that potential language loopholes could hurt museums and taxpayers.
Ed Catron, chairman of the council-appointed Museum Oversight Board, asked the council to postpone voting on the contract until the two groups could have an outside attorney review the contract. To avoid more time and arguments on the issue, he said another opinion on conflicts, such as the definition of “municipal,” were needed.
Heated, across-the-board public comment and council discussion on the issue included a comparison between a the city/museum squabble and the war in Iraq as well as confusion over voting procedures that provoked audience outbursts.
Council members opposing the contract agreed with the oversight board that consulting an independent attorney and having more discussion could help iron out issues before they become problems.
Council members supporting the contract questioned what could be accomplished in two weeks.
“This has been going on for two years. I have a file on this that’s bigger than a phone book. It’s time to vote on this,” said Mike Hirter.
Members who voted in favor of the contract were Roger Baker, Donna Jean Boyer, Gary Roach, Joyce Starr and Mr. Hirter. Members who voted against the contract were Mayor Ken Shearin, Mike Bozarth, Bill Falkner and Barbara LaBass.
Nancy Hull can be reached at nancyhull@npgco.com.
This story has 5 comments. Click here to join in on the discussion.
Story Tools
Hyperlink Legend
E-mail story
Print friendly version
iPod friendly version
Today's Top Headlines
Holiday requests expected to rise
Grain truck concerns arise after wreck
Toy hamster’s popularity says a lot about economy
Stewart sentenced in sodomy case
In the courts, Nov. 21, 2009
JOB SEARCH
RECENTLY DISCUSSED
Coleman, Intel join forces
(61 comments)
Award offered on weapons theft
(23 comments)
Reward offered for stolen weapons
(1 comment)
It's your call, Nov. 19, 2009
(51 comments)
More Popular Discussions
(61 comments)
Award offered on weapons theft
(23 comments)
Reward offered for stolen weapons
(1 comment)
It's your call, Nov. 19, 2009
(51 comments)
Its done. Time to move forward with progression to expand and improve and get more people to visit the museums. This fight needs to stop. Friends of the Museum please keep in mind if you pursue a lawsuit against the City, you are costing me more tax dollars and your cause is not one I support. I encourage other paths and find future solutions instead of a lawsuit. Help not hinder. In a year this contract will be up again, find another alternative one that is progressive and positive with a plan.
I agree with you, Wildwest. it's time to move on and find a proactive way to revitalize the mansion and museums. Instead of spending thousands of dollars on attorneys, set up a trust for the preservation of the mansion, appoint NEUTRAL trustees to oversee, set conditions for dispersal of the funds and challenge the general public and museums members to match the funds in the trust. There are lots of ways to turn negatives into positives, but, personalities have to stay out of the fight and everyone needs to begin with a positive/cohesive frame of mind.
Yes, now that "the museum squabble is over" let's spend a lot of money on a building that really has nothing to do with St. Joe history unless you include "robber baron" as a historical classification.
The property at 1100 Charles has tried and tried to be a tourist attraction for over 50 years to no avail. In spite of huge efforts by the St. Joseph Museums Inc, visitors strain to go over the 6-per day mark over the course of a year. Don't know how much has been spent on marketing? Inform yourself by asking SJM board or staff. There has been a lot of money poured down that rat-hole.
Building maintenance has been ignored? No way, St.Jose, as over $200,000 00 has been spent there over the lst several years.
Handicapped accessable not tried? For years and years a solution has been searched for, concluding with $150,000.00 for an elevator.
With that, and everything else, it's too bad Ed and Linda Hood were chased off when they wanted to buy it. Good luck,City of St. Joe!
Oh, yeah, why don't the Friends of the Mansion come up with a $4,000,000.00 fundraiser?