NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

The circle of history continues
by Ken Newton
Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Where Southern soldiers fought and died a century before, I played Wiffle ball with my cousins. A hit over the defensive mounds to the trenches beyond, a home run.

Historical reverence means little to kids. Then again, the park interpreting this Civil War battleground included a mini-golf course.

The battle of Columbus-Belmont proved significant in the war’s western campaign. The Confederate Gen. Leonidas Polk moved troops onto the 150-foot high bluffs at Columbus, Ky., in September 1861, wanting to strangle Union movement on the Mississippi River.

Southern forces dragged a huge chain across the river to stop northern gunboats and supplies. With huge cannons firing from on high, Polk’s troops wanted to devise the “Gibraltar of the West.”

That lasted about six months. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, combing southeastern Missouri in pursuit of St. Joseph’s own Gen. M. Jeff Thompson, helped chase the Confederates from Columbus, which never again left Northern control.

And the state park, with its ramparts, displayed armaments and a portion of the big chain, made for some weekend picnics during my youth.

In roughly this period and farther west, the Union Army moved earth to create a fortification on a bluff above the Missouri River in St. Joseph. This is Fort Smith. Some local folks want to resurrect it from nearly a century and a half of vegetation.

Given my memories of preserved Civil War encampments (after the Wiffle ball, I visited the Columbus-Belmont museum and got my picture taken atop artillery), I favor the project.

But the suggestion to fund this rising puts in focus a broader discussion about the distribution of federal dollars.

A city application went out for a Land and Water Conservation Fund grant, a matching-money program of the National Park Service that furthers, in the federal agency’s words, “the concept of a permanent, national recreation estate.”

In other words, a pool of money exists for the development of sites like Fort Smith. Much of the fund derives from offshore oil leases. Score one for the “drill now” crowd.

A reasonable question arises. Why would a nation with a debt approaching $11 trillion (that’s 11 with a dozen zeroes behind it) contribute money to a project that has languished for 15 decades?

The answer: Inertia stands as the greatest force against fiscal responsibility. The Land and Water Conservation Fund has money, and someone will get it.

Dangle a pork chop, and hungry canines will leap. We might as well get a dog in the fight.

In 15 of the 16 Missouri counties covered by this newspaper, voters favored John McCain in the November election. And John McCain stood on his legislative record of opposing the overextension of federal spending.

The U.S. budget stands horribly out of balance. Still, no blushing seems apparent in seeking federal assistance for a local Civil War fort long left to nature.

As concerns the grant, it appears dumb to ask but even dumber not to. That’s the system.

An added note. For more than 70 years, the battlefield at Columbus rested fallow. A local initiative began for a Civil War memorial, but it gained no traction until labor became available in 1934 from one of FDR’s New Deal programs.

The circle of history continues.

Ken Newton’s column runs on Tuesday and Sunday.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
heritage_sarahhochschwender January 27, 2009 at 8:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)

municipalities are salivating at the prospect of getting their hands on these projects. the funding is openly called Obama Money ......... the feds are looking for projects to throw money at. it takes something like two years to prepare an application. lesser and often previously rejected projects will be at the head of the line. it just happens that this is a worthy project and a win-win for our city.

john mccain was defeated, and the new president is planning to throw untold amounts of taxpayer dollars into a spending program. am i happy with this? no. do i want my city officials on top of the heap grabbing for the obama dollars? YES. those are my tax dollars.

i like the "...... even dumber not to>" !!!!!!!!!!

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: