NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Loss of funds on the radar
Rosecrans may lose revenue
by Marshall White
Monday, June 8, 2009

The city’s airport manager has been scrambling through a morass of federal roadblocks to stop the loss of 18 percent of the airport revenue.

The city side of aviation at Rosecrans Memorial Airport often seems to be an even-paced program without too much excitement. Last October, Mike Hurst, the airport manager, negotiated a five-year contract with the Federal Aviation Administration to lease tower space.

The contract generates $78,000 a year and the FAA had no questions before it routinely authorized the contract renewal, Mr. Hurst said. However, a certified letter from the FAA arrived on May 4 that stated that the agency was ending the contract on May 31.

The FAA’s contracts division felt that it could lease an office on Woodbine Road for $10,000 since the agency only had two technicians assigned to maintain equipment at Rosecrans, Mr. Hurst said. There was less than 30 days’ notice, Mr. Hurst said.

After a series of phone calls to regional FAA centers, Mr. Hurst got a promise that the contract would be continued through Sept. 30. On the surface, it looks like the FAA’s only reason for having a contract is the two technicians, but the situation is complicated.

In 1995, the FAA signed an interagency agreement with the National Guard Bureau to contract for a Level 1 Visual Flight Rules tower at Rosecrans, Mr. Hurst said. The interagency agreement calls for an annual meeting in July in Washington, Mr. Hurst said.

The airport manager and city staff will be at the annual meeting. Mr. Hurst hopes an agreement can be worked out between all parties that will maintain the FAA’s contribution to Rosecrans even if it opens an office on Woodbine Road.

Marshall White can be reached

at marshall@npgco.com.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
longarm45 June 8, 2009 at 5:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

theoretically, the faa office can be anywhere, but practically speaking, it is too easy to lose identification with the pilots it serves when it moves OFF THE AIRFIELD. I have seen this happen over 50 years of being a military bombardier/private pilot.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: