A complicated and slow restitution process in the Bonnie Sue Lawson case just became much simpler.
Also, a second person is being investigated by the FBI for fraud in the case, according to four people who attended a meeting this week between the FBI and Buchanan County officials. That second possible theft could total about $14,000, sources said.
The Social Security Administration confirmed Friday that it will directly repay Ms. Lawson’s victims rather than repay them slowly as Ms. Lawson’s restitution trickles in.
“We will pay those folks back and then go after Ms. Lawson for the money,” said John Garlinger, regional spokesman for the Social Security Administration.
Current Buchanan County Public Administrator Bill McMurray held strong hopes that would be the case. If that hadn’t been the case, Mr. McMurray and the county would have had the “unbelievable” task of dividing Ms. Lawson’s monthly restitution checks of perhaps $200 between more than 100 victims.
That process would not only have been complicated, but it would have done little to relieve any single victim.
“This is the right thing to do, and I’m glad they’re doing it,” Mr. McMurray said. “I applaud Social Security for doing the right thing.”
Ms. Lawson resigned in 2006 as Buchanan County public administrator, an office that oversees funds and care for court-appointed elderly and indigent people. On May 18, she’ll begin serving a 37-month prison sentence after pleading guilty to stealing clients’ Social Security benefits.
Ms. Lawson currently owes $115,658 in restitution to about 160 victims.
A federal judge ordered Ms. Lawson to pay 10 percent of her monthly income, or $100, whichever is greater. She currently collects a LAGERS pension from her own time in office, a pension from her husband Maurice Lawson’s time as a state representative, and Social Security benefits, according to officials in this week’s meeting.
Joe Blumberg can be reached at joeblumberg@npgco.com.
Keep her Social security and divide in among the victims, she will see what it is like to do without !
The courts should have 37 months of pension and social security to divide up amongst the victims or reimburse the Social Security Administration. She isn't going to be using it while incarcerated. I'm surprised the SSA didn't cut her off from future SS disbursements for the remainder of her life.
It would be more fair to everyone including future Social Security recipients, that she give her entire retirement up. She will not need anything for the first three years in prison as her room, board, and medical will be paid for at taxpayer expense. Then when she gets out, she will have less than two years payments remaining to make all her victims somewhat whole. Under the present plan, it will take almost fifty years. Whats the odds?
underline the word "DEAL"
I think they should take all her SS money from her and any federal and state pensions she is receiving until it is paid off. She is about 70, so $200 a month will most likely not pay off her debt in her lifetime-so the deal is a farce. She should not get a dime and when she gets out of the joint, she should have to move in with her kids and sponge off them-after all, she didn't care what happened to the people that she stole from. The punishment should fit the crime.
I know her, I watched her at auctions, recklessly buying any and every stupid thing that caught her fancy. She had her fun, it should be over.
Has anyone noticed that there is never any mention of her political affliction in any news stories. Could that be because she is a democrat?