Term limits lead lawmakers to exit early

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. - With term limits bearing down, two Missouri lawmakers have resigned from office within the past two months to accept positions that hold more long-term potential.

The early departures of Reps. Dennis Wood, R-Kimberling City, and Ed Wildberger, D-St. Joseph, will result in special elections next February to select replacements for the final few months of their terms.

Those elections likely will cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars. Add it to the term-limit tab.

In the past eight years, Missouri has spent around a half-million dollars on special elections to replace lawmakers who left office early for other jobs as they neared the end of their maximum allowed time in the Legislature.

Across the nation, more lawmakers appear to be exiting early than before term limits took effect, said Jennie Drage Bowser, who tracks term limits for the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Put bluntly: "People jump ship when they know that term limits are going to knock them out," said Thad Kousser, a political science professor who has researched term limits and is a visiting scholar at The Bill Lane Center for the American West at Stanford University.

Missouri is one of 15 states that limit how long people can serve in state legislatures.

Voters in 1992 approved caps of about eight years each in the Missouri House of Representatives and Senate. The clock started ticking with the 1994 elections, meaning it wasn't until 2002 that most veteran House members and some senators were barred from seeking re-election. The deadline hit in 2004 for the remaining senators (those whose first four-year term after the voter initiative began with the 1996 election).

One of the first to quit early was Rep. Louis Ford, D-St. Louis, who ended his 20-year legislative career in January 2002 as he began what would have been his final year under term limits. His resignation gave Ford's son the inside track on winning the Democratic nomination for a special election.

Other term-limited lawmakers forewent their final state paychecks in favor of new careers in local government or the private sector. Wood and Wildberger both accepted appointments to county government jobs.

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Chuck Gross, R-St. Charles, resigned after the 2007 legislative session - a little more than a year before term limits would have forced him out - to become the St. Charles County director of administration. The special election to replace Gross cost $168,061, according to records provided to The Associated Press by the secretary of state's office.

"When you know that your time in the Senate is up, then you have to start planning - you've got a family to feed and a career to get back on track, so you start saying, 'What am I going to do when I leave here," Gross said last week. "An opportunity came up that I just couldn't turn down."

Rep. Fred Kratky, D-St. Louis, resigned about the same time as Gross. He could have run for election one more time under term limits but instead left to work full-time as the chief executive officer of the St. Louis Association of Realtors. Kratky said the prospect of term limits influenced his switch.

His wife, Michele Kratky, later succeeded him by winning an uncontested special election that cost the state $14,982. Even though that pales in comparison to the cost of some special elections, "that's still just a tremendous expense," Fred Kratky said last week.

Missouri's cost for special elections varies depending on the jurisdiction and whether there are other ballot items, which allow costs to be split with local governments.

Depending on how much time passes between a lawmaker's resignation and a special election, some of those election costs could be offset by the salary savings resulting from a vacant office.

Missouri's number of special elections rose during a roughly eight-year period after voters passed term limits. But the number of special elections that occurred during the most recent eight years (in the era of term limits) is comparable to the total for the eight years immediately preceding the passage of term limits.

Share Your Thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.


WhoisJohnGalt says...

It is worth a million to get rid of Ford from St Louis. Term limits WORK!

November 9, 2009 at 6:06 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

B4UGO says...

I am all for term limits. I think that they should apply to both the office and the person. Our founding fathers intended public service to be a revolving door. They didn't approve of career politicians and bureaucrats. How many of the people named above have ever worked in the private sector? How many have moved from one government job to another? How many are collecting multiple retirement checks from different branches of the governent? I'm glad that Kratky is moving on. We need new blood in the public sector and it's hard to do when the old guys never go away.

November 9, 2009 at 8:09 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

77cod says...

Term limits are good for the country, wish we had them in the congress. Those that feed at the trough get fat and forget who they are there to represent. It too often becomes more about gaining wealth and power than serving (current democrats show this with passage of health care fraud the people don't want it yet it passed). Voters need to "turn over" the performers who do not represent the will of the people.

November 9, 2009 at 8:24 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

TrappinFool says...

We NEED term limits in politics! We NEED them in Washington too. The career politicians will use this argument so they can keep their jobs and milk more money and perks from the citizens and companies. The politicians are more crooked than any criminal out there. We need term limits to keep them honest so they know they will not have an easy position until they die.

November 9, 2009 at 10:36 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

chefxh says...

"Add it to the term-limit tab."

Nice neutral stance there, NPG.

November 9, 2009 at 11 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

donaldo says...

i say if they leave early they shouldn't get there retirement. anyone else that leaves before their time loses there's.

November 9, 2009 at 2:49 p.m. ( | suggest removal )