NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Taking carbon out of the equation
RFK Jr. points to other nations’ progress
by Jimmy Myers
Friday, October 2, 2009

Environmentalist Robert Kennedy Jr. has a lot to say, and he won’t waste a second of his allotted speaking time.

Save for a quick drink of water, the son of the late senator and attorney general didn’t leave time for dramatic pauses or even the customary joke at the beginning of his speech about the environment Thursday at the 16th Convocation of Critical Issues at Missouri Western State University.

Mr. Kennedy, who has been critical of the former White House administration, kept politics out of his talk on how America can follow the success of other countries in going carbon-free, saving money, and saving the environment in the process.

The M.O. Looney Sports Complex, nearly full of Western students, faculty and community members as well as bus loads of high school students, listened to Mr. Kennedy’s story about his father’s admonition that strip mining in east Kentucky and West Virginia is flattening the Appalachian mountains in that area.

“He said, ‘They are permanently impoverishing those communities,’” Mr. Kennedy said of the conversation they had when he was 14. “‘There is no way they can regenerate the economy with the barren moonscapes that have been left behind.’”

Mr. Kennedy, a trial lawyer and head of two environmental organizations, concentrated most of his thoughts on turning away from oil and coal and looking to wind, geo-thermal and solar forms of energy, a process called de-carbonization.

He accused oil industry-funded propaganda for putting a kink in America’s progress toward a greener form of energy production. He said “phony think tanks” persuade Americans that “seat belts are bad for you, cholesterol is great for you, whales like being harpooned, and there is no such thing as global warming.”

Pointing to other countries that have experienced success in de-carbonizing and seeing huge profits, Mr. Kennedy said Iceland went from the poorest nation in Europe to the fourth richest when it focused on an abundance of geo-thermal resources for its energy. Sweden also saw a leap to No. 6 after going green in 1996. Brazil, he said, is enjoying the longest and most robust economic expansion in South American history after taking carbon out of the equation.

“The Midwestern states are the Saudi Arabia of wind,” he said, adding that North Dakota, Montana and Texas have enough wind resources for 100 percent of America’s power needs, even if every American drove an electric car.

The problem lies in creating a grid to transport that power throughout the lower 48 states. But if a national grid for power was created (estimated cost of $200 billion) like the grid for communications, the price of power would no longer be significant.

Mr. Kennedy met with President Barack Obama and his staff less than two weeks ago, and said that following health care, energy is on deck as an issue to address.

“This is something that is coming,” he said. “And it will leave our children with clean and prosperous, wholesome lives that they deserve.”

Jimmy Myers can be reached

at jimmym@npgco.com.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
Timothy_Dike October 2, 2009 at 11:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)

No where does this article indicate the estimated cost to the consumer. But they tell me there will be rebates to help the poor families afford it. So the middle income class will most likely pay even more. NO thank you 0bama. The reference to us being the Saudi Arabia of wind ignore the fact that we have even more of the cleanest coal in the world in the Powder River region of Wyoming. God blesses this country with an abundant resource, let's use it and quit playing these environmental games. I have no problem with developing wind and solar, but they are only part time answers. You have to have a way to generate power when the sun is not shining and the wind is not blowing. Coal, and nuclear power are two easy answers.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
tydej October 2, 2009 at 1:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Clean coal is still coal that puts toxins into the air and destroys the enviornment. The wind towers that are in use now do not require mush wind at all to operate. Even if ground level winds are at 5 mph they are able to produce power. Many times there may not seem to be a wind on ground level yet the wind turbines still turn. I am in favor of more wind power in our nation, as not only a need but as something we as citizens of earth must do. The world will contine after our greatgrand children pass. We must not only think of us in our times now but look many generations down the path and see what we can do. Our nation is one that is about right now and the next generation but we must think beyond that. We have learned our lesson from destructive habits that ruined our landscape and I would hope we as a nation that we would want to perserve what we have now and only try to make it better. The long range effects of even clean coal still pollute the earth. We need to take a long hard look at what we have done to North America and see how we can fix some of the wrong.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
trish October 4, 2009 at 11:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

What about in California where they have the wind power windmills and now they are complaining about the birds and bats that are getting killed in them? Then the solar panels in CA where they are complaining of the toxic crap they put in them is worse. No thank you Mr Scummy! I will stick with my domestic oil and natural gas, and lets not forget nuclear energy. Our Naval subs run on nuclear energy, so why not America? The capitalists are evil doers according to some in this country. No capitalism is what made our country. To make a long story short, I do not think it will matter in the end as people will always find something to gripe and complain about. It is human nature. No one will agree but if Venzeula and China can go in and drill off our coasts than why can't we? They are making money two fold off of us. First they are getting our natural resources and second they can sell it back to us, our own resources? Does not make alot of sense to me. Just my 2 cents.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: