The city of St. Joseph and its firefighters agree their bargaining finally yielded a wage offer.
And that’s about it.
The Local No. 77 of the International Association of Firefighters is suing the city in Buchanan County circuit court for bargaining in bad faith when the sides met to discuss wages and other conditions last winter. Law prohibits firefighters from striking.
While the suit drags toward a June 1, 2010, bench trial date, the two parties continue to trade barbs in and out of court. They met Monday, and neither reported much progress. The city did address the firefighters’ main contention by offering a wage proposal — a three-year freeze of the current salary structure, according to firefighters attorney Steve Bukaty.
“It’s insulting,” Mr. Bukaty said. “It’s unconscionable that they are asking these guys to risk their lives every day, while they spend millions of dollars on pet projects.”
To solidify its position, the firefighters gave the News-Press copies of the city’s 2007 compensation survey and the union’s 2008 follow-up. The city identified 20 cities in six states that it deemed comparable to St. Joseph, including Lee’s Summit, Mo., Joplin, Mo., Council Bluffs, Iowa, Decatur, Ill., Topeka, Kan., and Springfield, Ill.
On average, St. Joseph’s firefighters made 31 percent less than the other cities in the 2007 study. St. Joseph’s entry-level salary of $30,032 ranked behind every city except Independence, Mo., and its average of the minimum and maximum salary range ($36,368) trailed all 20 cities.
The union’s survey looked at 15 of those 20 jurisdictions from the city’s survey for firefighters after one, six, 11, 16 and 20 years of service. Averaged out among those six steps, St. Joseph firefighters’ base salary lags behind those other cities by 40 percent.
Mr. Bukaty alleges the city spent nearly $4 million this year on projects that weren’t necessities — like the Chiefs’ training camp or a new elevator at the YMCA — while denying the firefighters a raise they feel is long overdue.
“Disputing or not disputing what the numbers reflect, that doesn’t create new money for the city,” said Ivan Schraeder, an attorney from the Lowenbaum Partnership in St. Louis who the city hired in this case. “Whether you agree or disagree with the assertions that the city employees are behind other communities doesn’t really help when you don’t have the available revenues to commit the pay.”
City Manager Vince Capell said the firefighters received what amounted to cost-of-living raises two of the past four years and the city would give more if it could.
“I don’t think there is anybody who would want to give a raise more than me,” he said. “But I’ve got to have money to do it.”
The union fired back that the city underestimates its revenue and overestimates its expenditures to the tune of a $2 million discrepancy each year, and the firefighters hired an accounting firm from Oklahoma to refute the city’s assertions. But even that turned contentious, with Mr. Schraeder claiming the union refused to let him question the firefighters’ expert or ask questions about the study’s methodology.
“We are very close to impasse, if not already there,” Mr. Schraeder said.
That too is debatable with Mr. Bukaty, who claimed the two sides have anywhere from 50 to 100 proposals on the table, and the real point of contention is the city’s refusal to negotiate wages. Mr. Schraeder countered that the city is negotiating with itself at this point.
Ultimately, it’s up to Judge Randall Jackson to wade through all of this and find a verdict if the two sides can’t hammer out a resolution in the next seven months. But even then, the court can’t order the city to make a specific proposal, only to negotiate in good faith.
So for a resolution, the two sides will have to agree on more than just whether a proposal is on the table.
“While the judge can’t force them to make a particular proposal,” Mr. Bukaty said, “the citizens of St. Joe and the City Council can.”
And vice versa.
R.J. Cooper can be reached
at rjcooper@npgco.com.
“I don’t think there is anybody who would want to give a raise more than me,” Vince Capell... LOL!!!
The City has budgeted well over $100,000 (City budget)for outside counsel for these negotiations. The city as already spent over $35,000 of that. How much more taxpayer $'s on this lawsuit that we don't know about? Keep in mind that budgeted $ amount does not included the cost of man hours that the City's legal dept and City's bargaining team which includes 4 dept directors have spent on these negotiations ALL while not bargaining in good faith. What a waste of our taxpayer dollars! AND the firefighters base wages are still 30 plus % under paid at the minimum! This does not include that they (all city employees for that matter) are paying over $950 for family/ dependant health insurance per month out of their own pocket! Its time the City gets off their butts, negotaite in good faith, and pay all their employees including the police and fire department comparable wages & benefits!
I would say that the city needs to be paying more of their insurance premium for them if they are in fact paying 950 a month for family coverage this seems to be almost highway robbery.And all of the money the city is paying for attorneys to fight the firefighters they should have given it to them and spread it out amoungst them.I we could provide for them better then we are.Mr capell I think Mcdonalds is hiring maybe you should apply since you are not paying the firefighter much more then they make after you make them pay 950 a month for insurance if this is what it is and see how you like living on a small salary.Time for a new city manager and a new Mayor.
The city has used the downturn in the economy as an excuse to eliminate the pay matrix. This was a well-executed manuever orchestrated by the city manager to lower the payscale of a fireman as he moves through the ranks and/or acquires seniority. As the "old guys" retire, their positions are filled through promotion; this promoted fireman will be paid considerably less than the previous. The promoted fireman will be replaced by a new hire; this person will be lucky to rise above the minumum pay for each rank throughout his entire career. In ten years, salaries across the board will have been reduced considerably. Then what? The city will find itself in a different dilemma in a different economical climate and will be just as ill-prepared to handle the situation...nothing really solved...but atleast everyone is equally screwed. C'mon people...this is not what the public voted for.
'Guido Sarducci' working at the golden arches?
Didn't Mr. Capell get a nice raise recently ??
according to Mr. Capell's contract (public information that can be obtained from city clerks office at city hall) he receives base salary of $124,035.00 per year, $5,400 per year for car allowance, plus the city contributes $8,000 per year into his 401K. in addition Capell's severance package on seperation from the city includes lump sum of one third (1/3) of his base salary, 1/3 of 401k contributions including all benefits such as life, medical, dental, & disability insurances.