NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Work begins to establish Downtown quiet zone
Medians will prevent vehicles from driving around crossing arms
by Clinton Thomas
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Wes Jones, right, and Jason Angst, center, maneuver tampers across fresh asphalt Monday afternoon at the rail road crossing along Fourth Street. as other members of the city of St. Joseph street and maintenance department work on the newly reconstructed intersection. BNSF Railway began installing new signals at the crossing  last week as part of a larger plan to implement a Downtown quiet zone.

Photo by Todd Weddle / St. Joseph News-Press / Purchase this photo

Wes Jones, right, and Jason Angst, center, maneuver tampers across fresh asphalt Monday afternoon at the rail road crossing along Fourth Street. as other members of the city of St. Joseph street and maintenance department work on the newly reconstructed intersection. BNSF Railway began installing new signals at the crossing last week as part of a larger plan to implement a Downtown quiet zone.

Let the real work begin.

After months of planning from city, state and corporate officials, BNSF Railway Co. began last week to install new signals at its Fourth Street railroad crossing. The work is part of the larger plan to implement a Downtown quiet zone that will allow trains to travel through the area without blowing their whistles.

Once the railroad completes signal upgrades at the Fourth Street and Francis Street crossings, the city will construct concrete medians that will prevent vehicles from driving around the crossing arms to beat a train.

The city will permanently close three additional crossings. Workers will barricade crossings on Mitchell Avenue and Monterrey Street by Dec. 20, at which point the railroad will tear out the crossing and eventually the pavement that leads up to the tracks. A fence will block the third crossing, an alley near Seneca Street.

Clint Thompson, director of planning and community development for the city, said the project schedule will ensure drivers still have a way across the tracks with minimal detours.

“We’re trying to make sure we coordinate the improvements so we’re not closed on Fourth Street at the same time that we’re closed on Monterrey and Mitchell,” Mr. Thompson said. “At any given time during construction, there will be at least one place where people can cross.”

The city hopes it can begin work on the Mitchell and Monterrey closings by Nov. 9 so it can complete the job by Dec. 20. Median work on the two crossings that will remain open — Fourth and Francis Streets — must be completed by April 1 so the railroad can modify the crossings by May, when the quiet zone is expected to take effect.

The City Council passed an ordinance last month to help Seaman & Schuske Metal Works deal with the closure. The company previously stated concerns that the Mitchell Street closing would affect its business. In response, the council approved $10,000 in Community Development Block Grant funding for the company to modify its building so customers can load and unload from Fourth Street.

The quiet zone project will not cost the city a single dollar. The Missouri Department of Transportation will pay a portion of the costs, while credits from BNSF for closing the three crossings will cover the city’s share of the bill.

The council approved the quiet zone project in May.

Clinton Thomas can be reached

at clintonthomas@npgco.com.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
Thecitizen October 13, 2009 at 7:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I will kinda miss the ol trains....

Recommend:
+ 1
- 0
blazer6465 October 13, 2009 at 1:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

me too, sadly, me too. I have been hearing the trains whistle there for as long as I can remember, they are a comforting sound to me.

Surely, anyone who has complained about the noise of the trains, knew they were there before they acquired the property that they are complaining about.

Now, what are you going to find to whine about next? The jets landing at Rosecrans, maybe. they are just as noisy as the trains, and they dont bother me either.

I will miss the sound of the trains whistle.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
SingMeBackHome October 13, 2009 at 4:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I concur! It's designed as safety feature, not just great sound effects for Johnny Cash or Boxcar Willie.

It seems falsely entitled, grandious even, that a convenient pound of cure now outweighs what an ounce of prevention has repeatededly proven?

Me wonders if they have ever seen the aftermath of a slow moving vehicle, crossing tracks in which no alert was sounded? I recall two(2)specific instances. Both at the quarry crossing in Amazonia. Both involved a loaded dumptruck, faulty crossing signals, failure to sound any audible warnings on a steep, twisted road that unfortunately levels immediately onto the R.R.tracks at the bottom. Both times, same railroad. Both times resulted in the drivers fatality. The only difference being many years had elapsed in between. It leaves those years to continually wonder.......

<insert logic & common sense here....

"If you can fathom the weight of their families broken heart...shouldn't an ounce of prevention be demanded as the only acceptable investment?"

Or next, impose a new tax that would afford us the labor needed to remove the pesky sirens & annoying lights so Emergency Vehicles can no longer pose the same inconvenience as the train whistle...
AND while we're at it..
How bout those instrusive storm sirens?
...I digress....

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
donaldo October 13, 2009 at 10:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

bnsf wil have a quiet zone. will union pacific? they also go through st. joe.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
WhoisJohnGalt October 14, 2009 at 6:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The term "An accident waiting to happen" comes to mind.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: