NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Missouri should rethink policies to keep children safe
by Steve Booher
Monday, October 26, 2009

For a while this morning, let’s pretend that you’re a Missouri Children’s Division caseworker. One of the many cases that crosses your desk involves a newborn. A relative has called in to report that the baby is being abused in the home. You’re dispatched to investigate.

First, you find that the baby’s mother is already in jail on felony abuse charges. The baby suffered bruises to his rib cage, under his arms and around his legs from being squeezed — almost as if someone tried to squeeze the life out of him. With the mother locked up, you may wonder who is caring for the infant.

Second, you see that a relative who actually lived in the home filed reports of abuse to the baby and two older boys who lived in the home. The relative says she saw the father kick the boys on repeated occasions. Another caseworker investigated at the time, but the older boy took the blame and said he bruised the younger boy while they were playing.

Another relative — in fact, the father’s own daughter — has also contacted your office and reported abuse to her brother.

Before visiting the home, you might log on to a computer and search for the Your Missouri Courts Web site for information about the father. Although he was not convicted of a violent crime, you do find that he had two orders of protection granted against him, one in 2000 and the other in 2006.

The Web site doesn’t list who requested the order of protection, but obviously someone was frightened of the father.

You schedule a home visit, but can’t spend much time there because paperwork is piling up and you have other pressing cases.

What would you do in this situation?

Without ever setting foot in this house, alarming signs are telling that at least the boys in this house are being abused regularly. Should you start the process to have these kids removed from the home? Or should you recommend keeping the family together and try to get the father some anger-management help?

These are decisions that Children’s Division workers face every day.

The situation is compounded by the fact that you have no real power here. To take a child away from parents, law enforcement or juvenile authorities must be contacted, and they are the ones placing the kids in protective custody.

In addition, your employer, the Missouri Department of Social Services, has a policy to guide your thinking. It’s called “family reunification.” The belief is that kids should remain with a family whenever possible and, if they are removed, they should be returned as soon as possible. The policy aims to stop the flow of children into the state’s foster care programs by using abuse prevention programs.

Unfortunately, this policy didn’t help 7-week-old Donald Rathman.

The baby suffered several severe blows to the head and eventually died at Heartland Regional Medical Center. His life was short and filled with violence that he could not understand.

Maybe it’s time for Missouri to rethink family reunification. There’s no doubt that families are important, but the safety of children should be paramount. Some families should be ripped apart, especially if doing so will save the life of a child.

And, maybe we need to look at the procedure for removing kids from that danger. It’s good to have checks and balances, but if we have to expose a kid to danger because removing them requires the help of another overworked, overloaded department, then maybe that should change, too.

Of course, it’s too late to help little Donald Rathman.

But maybe we can save the next child, or the next one, or the one after that.

Steve Booher’s column runs on Monday. He can be reached at steveb@npgco.com.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
fanofsports October 26, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Well said!

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
peakabu October 26, 2009 at 9:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

So sad...and so true. Where has our common sense of decency gone? No human being should ever have to go through these things. Maybe this reunification policy is what's causing it? Maybe some of these abusers are continuing the cycle they were raised in because no one took them away from abusive childhoods?

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
rxyrch October 26, 2009 at 5:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Missouri ranks 5th, in the nation for deaths by child abuse. Buchanan County ranks no 1 in the north west region of Missouri. This region includes counties from Atchison to Putnam Counties in the North, from Buchanan to Chariton Counties west to east, and Cass, Johnson, Pettis to the South, excluding Jackson county. This is a large area to be number one for deaths of children. I have been harping about the need for change for 4 years, and it isn't just the reunification issue. there have been 7 deaths in 4 years, including my grandson who was murdered by someone who had a previous history of child and sexual abuse of a child according to a safe exam. the excuse we were given was, the doctors report was given to another worker not the one working the alleged abuse and molestation case. the case worker in caden's case didn't know about that report, but someone in jeff city knew of the previous allegations. the detective decided since my daughter and i lawyered up, WE did it. so he didn't investigate any further. i work in a law firm. Attitudes have to change along with policy. investigations need to be done, instead of guessing. i didn't want this to happen to another family, and i have contacted everyone i know, and everyone asks, what can i do. and now it has happened, again. how many children will it take?

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
fosterprnt October 26, 2009 at 11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

As a foster parent, I see what these case workers deal with on a daily basis. However in situations of abuse to a child whether it be physically or sexually I DO NOT believe it is in the child's best interest to remain in the home to try reunification. Reunification should only be used for very minimal mistreatment such as a dirty living environment or situations along those lines. When these cases are taken to court, it is supposed to be what is in the best interest of the child. How can abuse be the best interest?? We need more people to report these situations..I just hope that because of the lack of response from the differant divisions that people don't feel like there is not a need to continue to report abuse or other situations. These children need someone to speak up for them as they can not do it themselves. On the other hand I think that our Judicial system stinks!!! These kids are rushed through the system way too fast. How can a family turn themselves around in so little time...they can't....most will fail again, so then the kids will eventually be put through more trauma. Let's get these families fixed the first time before sending kids back home.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 0
Steve_O November 19, 2009 at 2:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I am a firm believer of making kids mind, and spanking is also ok if done properly but I have very few patience with people swearing at their children in stores or slapping them in the head, or screaming at them like animals.
Unfortunately for Me, I am Very short tempered about these things and I am afraid that I might lose my temper and cause someone serious injury for mis-treating a child. I know that it is NOT my business but I can not help the way I feel.
If the laws would do what they are made for it would be less of a chance for these senseless deaths. In my opinion the Social Services workers should be REQUIRED to contact police, and remove the endangered child/children at once, without letting the children out of his/her sight until the Police arrive. What needs to be done in order to give these social workers the authority to do this? We CAN NOT leave these children with abusive parents for even one minute and Still be able to look at ourselves in a mirror.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: